![]() ![]() Therefore, his musical likes are Jazz or Classical or both,ģ. He mentions no “Hippy’ words or rock and roll music. This leads me to believe he was employable and conservative. The killer wore his hair cut short during an era where long hair dominated youth. The killer may have been a journalist covering the story, outsmarting everyone because he was both killer and investigator.Ģ. The killer interests include the legal system and journalism. If I wrote for a paper, I would have no fear of being monitored, because nobody would expect me to hand write anything. ![]() The killer may have been exposed to just how we operate when conducting an investigation.If he was a reporter for the Chron or Vallejo Times or Napa Register, he would have had access to police and also access to how other killers make mistakes. I believe he may have covered crime or court proceedings. He was driven to write, but sent only hand written messages because nobody would expect him to hand write anything. The killer probably used a typewriter for his profession. He wanted to prove he was the killer, but everything else was false, meant to slip up investigators.Īfter a number of years of studying the killer, I can determine the following may be true. The first slip up sleuths fall into is believing the Zodiac tells the truth. Hat makes anyone believe that Zodiac was not intentionally leaving false clues? He was known to lie. Let me make some very quick declarations, I will not discuss my work, but suffice it to say I am an investigator.The FBI know far more than they let on. I personally think any and all misspelled words were a ruse. If he is a crime or court meat reporter, it would make so much sense. Whoever the Zodiac is or was had interests that included Norse mythology, crime beats/ fellow journalists, music etc. I am researching any and all Sf Chron writers and will soon look into any vallejo Napa writers who could be musicians and historians. Who were his associates at the radio station at the time? Could one one them been riding with Pat and “discovered” the phone off the hook, and urged Pat to take credit? The wife took a fall. Could he have been a journalist and musicians who worked for SF Chron? Maybe as a crime beat reporter? Or one of the other papers associated with the case? I always questioned Pat Stanley’s version of driving by the phone booth on Main Street to see a phone left off the receiver. He also was a reader, and clearly a writer. Everything points to his being a musician, and maybe one who explored the Great American Songbook.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |